Wednesday, June 29, 2011

The FVR Spitfire Array

The FVR Spitfire Array

(A "poor man's 4square" for Top Band)


Adding Gain to an existing vertical

Assume you already have a tower already being fed as a single vertical on 160. How do you get more gain? Most people's dream is the 4-square which yields an additional 5.5 dB of gain over one vertical. However, as you can see in the figure, the 4-square uses a lot of real estate-remember to consider the space needed for radials! It also requires four towers, or the at least the ability to support four verticals. A number of hams, some of whose calls are indicated in the chart, have devised alternative concepts, using tower supported wire verticals, parasitic arrays of some kind, inverted L elements, or slopers, all of which are simpler to erect than a full-size 4-square. We present another alternative-the FVR Spitifire array-which comes close to the performance of the 4-square, but is much more compact and can be erected in essentially the same space already occupied by the single vertical and its radials. Furthermore, the incremental cost of upgrading your tower to a Spitfire array is quite small.

FVR Spitfire Array (2 switching directions)

  • 1/4 wave grounded tower as driven element and support for wire elements
  • 1/2 wave ungrounded folded parasitic wire elements
  • Conventional 1/4 wave radial system for tower driven element
  • No additional radial system needed for 1/2 wave parasitic elements
  • Avoids ground current loss in parasitic elements
  • Inexpensive upgrade to existing tower
  • 2-direction switching, expandable to 4 directions

The Spitfire is a parasitic array which uses a conventional grounded quarter-wave tower as the driven element and adds a parasitic reflector and director. What is unique about this array is that the parasitic elements are sized to be half-wave elements which are not grounded, unlike previous concepts where all the elements are grounded. As shown in the figure, the elements are folded at their ends to meet the length requirements. The advantage of ungrounded elements is that they do not use or need a ground radial system to provide a current return path. This avoids a downfall of parasitic verticals with grounded elements, which can be demonstrated in a computer modeling program. That is that the real gain of grounded parasitic arrays quickly erodes when ground losses are present because the losses prevent the proper current distributions from being induced in the parasitic elements. The Spitfire does use a conventional quarter-wave radial system under the driven element tower. The bottoms of the parasitic elements are about 10 feet above ground. This distance is high enough for safety but low enough for doing necessary work. The only critical dimension in the Spitfire array is the distance from the tower to the ends of the parasitic elements. It was determined empirically through computer modeling that the distance which maximizes F/B is exactly one quarter wavelength as shown in the figure. (Gain is not particularly sensitive to that spacing). The configuration shown provides 2 switching directions (forward and rear). We will show how to turn it into a full 4 quadrant system.


Direction switching details



Direction switching is accomplished by simple relay switching which adds in a length of wire along the lower horizontal portion of the parasitic element to change it from a director to reflector or vice versa. One relay is closed while the other is opened.

FVR Spitfire Array ("Poor man's 4-square")

  • Tower always driven
  • 2 parasitic wires "active" at a time. i.e. 1 & 2 (or 3 & 4)
  • Other 2 wires grounded until activated
  • Fits in circle of 270 ft diameter

It is straightforward to configure the Spitfire as a full 4-quadrant system. Two more parasitic "wings" are added perpendicular to the two which were shown earlier. The system operates with two of the four parasitics wires "active" at one time. The remaining two wires, off to the sides, are detuned by grounding them so that they do not couple into the system. (It was determined through computer modeling that trying to make use of all four parasitic elements at a time did not improve upon using just the two). The tower is always active as the driven element. To beam in direction 1, element 1 is configured as a director and element 2 as a reflector. Elements 3 and 4 are grounded. To switch to direction 3, elements 1 and 2 would be grounded, and elements 3 and 4 are ungrounded with number 3 being the director and 4 the reflector. In this manner, the four switching directions shown in the figure can be provided. The entire array fits in the same real estate as occupied by the quarter wave radials under the tower.

Spitfire Elevation Pattern

The Spitfire array was developed through extensive computer modeling with the popular EZNEC software. The plot shows the elevation pattern of the Spitfire array compared to a single vertical. At low elevation angles, the gain over the single vertical is about 5 dB. Note that the vertical plane lobe is quite "fat" and provides significant higher angle radiation where the single vertical does not. This attribute may actually prove to be advantageous for DX under the high-angle propagation conditions which are believed to predominate at times over low angles on 160 meters.

Spitfire Azimuth Pattern

The azimuth pattern, taken at an elevation angle of 25 degrees is shown and compared with the omnidirectional vertical. The theoretical F/B approaches 30 dB at the design frequency.

Computer Model Gain

The computed gain is shown across the entire 160 meter band. The design frequency is around 1830 kHz. The gain holds up well from the low end of the band up to the "JA window", and drops off sharply above that. For reference, the gain of a single vertical (some 5 dB less) is also shown.

Computer Model Front-to-Back ratio


The computed front-to-back ratio is plotted. The F/B peaks at nearly 30 dB at the design frequency, but exhibits a fairly narrowband characteristic, unlike the gain. This suggests that tuning of the array to achieve this theoretical F/B will be fairly critical. The turnaround in F/B near the high end of the band (2 MHz) does not have much significance since the radiation pattern becomes badly distorted and the gain in this region drops below 0 dBi.

Spitfire vs. 4-square

The azimuth pattern of the Spitfire is now compared to the "dream" 4-square (at 25 degrees elevation angle). The 4-square provides about a half dB additional gain in the forward direction and somewhat better rejection to the rear, but the Spitfire comes within spitting distance of it!

A 2-direction Spitfire has been up and running at K1VR since December 1997. Based on the very encouraging results obtained so far, we are ready to proceed with upgrading to a full 4-direction configuration soon. We have learned that the biggest technical challenge is the need to carefully tune the parasitic elements to resonance, for the reasons discussed earlier. The main obstacle to perfect tuning appears to be the residual unwanted coupling of the tower and other element during the resonance-measuring procedure. We are still in the process of perfecting the setup. At this point, we see about 1 S-unit of gain over just the tower fed as a single vertical. The observed F/B on DX signals is about 3 to 4 S-units, or around 15 dB, and could be improved with more fine tuning (although we don't expect the gain to be improved much). Does it work? Well...the first DX QSO with the new array on 160 meters was VK6HD on long path at local sunset. Generating runs of Europeans is easy. There is little or no waiting in line to work DX. In summary, the Spitfire appears to be the most effective DX antenna yet on 160 at K1VR. Look for a future article on the Spitfire in one of the amateur magazines.

Parasitic Element Tuning Procedure

The parasitic elements needed to be carefully tuned to the proper resonant frequencies. Simply cutting the lengths according to formula or to the dimensions in the computer model is not accurate enough in the real world, when considerations such as the velocity factor of insulated wire and environmental effects are taken into account. We strongly recommended direct measurement of the resonance frequency of the director and reflector. To do this, the corner of each element is temporarily opened and an antenna analyzer (such as the MFJ-259, which we used) is inserted at this point. By injecting RF into the element with the analyzer and measuring the SWR vs. frequency, the resonance can be determined at the point of minimum SWR. The lengths of the horizontal director and reflector segments are pruned to the resonant frequencies determined by the computer model: 2.00 MHz for the director and 1.90 MHz for the reflector. (The high resonant frequency of the reflector may seem odd, but appears to be a consequence of the sloping geometry of the element). While tuning one element, it is important that the the tower and the other parasitic element not couple and corrupt the measurement. (We are measuring self-resonance of the element, not mutual coupling resonance). To do this the tower is electrically opened from ground at its base, and the other parasitic elements are best lowered or removed completely during tuneup.

Parts List

  • ~1000 ft wire (#12 THHN)
  • 24 insulators
  • 8 DPDT relays
  • 4 2" x 4" x 16' wood posts
  • Rope
  • DC control cables
  • Test equipment: antenna analyzer
  • Total cost = cheap

The parts list for upgrading one's existing tower system to a full 4-quadrant Spitfire array is given. No expensive or exotic materials are required.

K1VR Spitfire Installation



K1VR Relay Switch Box Installation

The switching relays are enclosed in a watertight plastic food container which is mounted to a wood post support. The posts used are pressure-treated 2"x4"x16" planks which are sunk about 3 feet into the ground. The connections to the relay box, at about the 10 foot level above ground, are made via feedthrough insulators mounted on the box.

Spitfire Variations

  • 2 or 4 switching directions
  • Adapts easily to non resonant towers (i.e. non l/4)
  • Scales to other bands (80, 40)
  • Space-saver single-wing (reflector) Spitfire in development
  • More gain with arrays of Spitfires

The Spitfire array is a flexible design which has a number of installation possibilities. We have already discussed the 2- and 4-direction versions. Computer modeling indicates that the concept works well over a wide range of tower heights. Resonance of the tower on 160 is not a prerequisite for good performance. The design has been applied to the 100 foot loaded tower at K1VR and modeling with towers as tall as 180 feet indicates excellent results, too. The folding geometry of the wings is simply modified for different tower heights. We also have scaled the design to 80 and 40 meter versions. Another variant, which may be of interest to those who are space-challenged, uses just one parasitic wing element and is under development. Finally, for those who are seeking the "ultimate", even more gain can be obtained by phased arrays of Spitfires...

Spitfire Broadside Array

With two towers spaced between one-half and five-eighths of a wavelength apart (spacing not critical), a broadside array of two identical Spitfires can be constructed, as shown in the figure. Both Spitfires are fed in phase from a coax T. The maximum gain is broadside to the array and it can be switched in the forward and rear directions. This array provides almost 3 dB additional gain over a single Spitfire. Note that end-fire operation is also possible, using the in-plane parasitic wings (not shown in the figure above) of a 4-wing Spitfire and using 180 degree phasing, with a half-wave coaxial delay line. The end-fire array provides about 1 dB less gain than the broadside version. Selectable broadside and end-fire modes of operation allows a 2-tower system to cover 4 quadrants.

Broadside Array Azimuth Pattern

The computed azimuth pattern of the broadside array (at 25 degrees elevation) is shown and compared to the single Spitfire. A consequence of the increased gain is the narrowing of the forward lobe. Rejection off the sides of the array also increases significantly, with some minor lobes remaining to the sides and rear.

Array Status at K1VR

  • 2-wire version in place since December '97 (4-wire version to be completed this spring)
  • Biggest technical challenge: need for careful tuning of parasitic elements
  • Observed gain: ~ 1 S unit over tower alone
  • Observed F/B: ~ 15 dB on DX (may improve with more fine tuning of parasitic elements)
  • First 160 DX QSO with new array: VK6HD . . . on long path!
  • Magazine publication in works

A 2-direction Spitfire has been up and running at K1VR since December 1997. Based on the very encouraging results obtained so far, we are ready to proceed with upgrading to a full 4-direction configuration soon. We have learned that the biggest technical challenge is the need to carefully tune the parasitic elements to resonance, for the reasons discussed earlier. The main obstacle to perfect tuning appears to be the residual unwanted coupling of the tower and other element during the resonance-measuring procedure. We are still in the process of perfecting the setup. At this point, we see about 1 S-unit of gain over just the tower fed as a single vertical. The observed F/B on DX signals is about 3 to 4 S-units, or around 15 dB, and could be improved with more fine tuning (although we don't expect the gain to be improved much). Does it work? Well...the first DX QSO with the new array on 160 meters was VK6HD on long path at local sunset. Generating runs of Europeans is easy. There is little or no waiting in line to work DX. In summary, the Spitfire appears to be the most effective DX antenna yet on 160 at K1VR. Look for a future article on the Spitfire in one of the amateur magazines.

No comments: